Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

Back
SHARABLE GRAPHICS

More Than 9 Million People Could Be at Risk of Homelessness If Federal Rental Assistance Was Eliminated

More than 9 million people receive housing assistance through rental assistance programs (Public Housing, Section 8, Section 202, Section 811, and Housing Choice Vouchers.) run by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). A new snapshot from the Alliance’s Homelessness Research Institute examines the potential impact of eliminating these critical programs. While the Alliance does not anticipate such dramatic cuts, the data is clear: any cuts to these important programs will result in people losing their current housing, placing them at risk of homelessness.

Homelessness is traumatic, dangerous and costly: keeping people in their current housing situation is far more efficient (and far less expensive) than the cycle of shelter, emergency room visits, and service interactions that communities may experience when someone becomes homeless.

Administered by HUD, these programs provide federal rental assistance to millions of households—and still, funding only reaches 1 in 4 households eligible for this assistance. While HUD is systemically underfunded, communities use the limited funds they do receive to target assistance to older adults, disabled people, and people who work hard yet make extremely low incomes. Any cuts will destabilize the individuals and families who receive this assistance and will hurt the communities they live in. Policymakers should take this risk seriously and provide the funding necessary to sustain existing programs and expand them to more people in need.

Methodology 

To create this snapshot, the Homelessness Research Institute analyzed data from HUD’s Office of Policy Development and Research.

This data includes people who receive federal rental assistance through any of the following programs: Public Housing, Section 8, Section 202, Section 811, and Housing Choice Vouchers.

It does not include people who receive Permanent Supportive Housing, Other Permanent Housing or Rapid Re-Housing unless this housing is funded through one of the programs listed above. It also does not include people who live in units that receive federal funding to preserve their affordability, like Section 236 or Moderate Rehabilitation.

Sign up to receive updates on the Alliance’s work, including the latest research, advocacy efforts, and real stories of progress — plus ways you can help drive lasting change.